Are changes in the wind?
Introduction
For generations of pets, the annual booster
vaccination has become a ritual Fido goes to the clinic to get his
inoculations and an exam that is considered a byproduct of the shot visit
by many owners.
These days, for convenience and budgets,
some owners forego the exam and take Fido or Fluffy to a pet supply store for a
jab of protection against rabies, distemper, parvovirus, and other canine
diseases.
But things may be changing. Veterinarians
at the Ohio Veterinary Medical Association conference in February said that
research shows that vaccines have a longer term of effectiveness against disease
than previously thought, and some veterinary colleges have published alternative
vaccination protocols that suggest three-year intervals after the initial shots
and a 12-month booster. Some veterinarians go further; they recommend skipping
vaccinations altogether for older animals that seldom leave home.
The change may be a welcome one, but it can
have hidden dangers if pet owners forego the annual exam as a result. Fido needs
that checkup even if he is fully protected against disease by last years
vaccination.
Why the switch?
We are making this change after years of
concern about the lack of scientific evidence to support the current practice of
annual vaccination and the increasing documentation that over- vaccinating has
been associated with harmful side effects, said the announcement of a new
vaccination protocol at the Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching
Hospital. Boosters, the annual re-vaccination recommendation on the vaccine
label is just that a recommendation, and is not a legal requirement except
for rabies. This recommendation could just as well have been every leap year or
full moon and is not, in most cases, based on duration of immunity studies.
The recommendation for annual boosters came
from the drug companies, according to veterinarians at the OVMA conference. The
only vaccine for which duration of immunity studies is required is rabies
vaccine; few studies have been done to pinpoint the length of protection offered
by distemper, parvovirus, and other vaccines to determine if boosters should be
given at greater or lesser intervals.
So why vaccinate?
Although there is a growing concern over
vaccine frequency, there is no doubt that vaccines control diseases that can
kill puppies and dogs and protect individual dogs from illness and death.
According to an article in the Journal of
the American Veterinary Medical Association in 1995, concerns center on the
potential for vaccines to trigger autoimmune diseases in susceptible dogs and
the necessity for annual boosters. Data is scant, but suspicion is growing,
according to Dr. Ronald D. Schultz of the University of Wisconsin Department of
Pathobiological Sciences.
I am a strong advocate of vaccine
use, Dr. Schultz said in the JAVMA article. We need to strike a balance
between those who feel that no vaccines should be given and those who are
vaccinating every week. Annual vaccination has become a knee-jerk response that,
for the most part, is unnecessary. We have come a long way in reducing disease
through vaccination, but perhaps we have gone too far.
How vaccines work
Vaccines stimulate the immune system to
produce antibodies to the disease so that the dog is protected against various
organisms in the environment. If the immunized dog is later exposed to the
infectious agent, the antibodies react quickly to attack and destroy the
disease.
Initial shots are given to puppies to
gradually phase-in immunity as the mothers milk protection wears off. Puppies
are generally vaccinated against parvovirus, distemper, adenovirus (vaccine also
protects against hepatitis), and parainfluenza in combined shots and against
rabies. They may also be vaccinated against leptospirosis, Lyme disease, and
corona virus if local conditions warrant or if the pet will be traveling in an
area where these diseases are known to be a problem.
Vaccines come in two types: killed virus or
bacterin and modified live virus or bacterin. The killed vaccines are mixed with
an adjuvant to boost the effectiveness, and various adjuvants are suspected of
causing problems. Killed vaccines are more stable, but they require more
injections to immunize the pet and are more likely to cause allergic reactions
ranging from low-grade fever or muscle aches to hives, facial swelling, or even
vomiting and diarrhea. In rare cases, a pet may collapse within a few minutes of
the injection from a severe anaphylactic reaction, but most reactions take a day
or more to manifest.
Modified live vaccines work more quickly
and for longer periods, are less expensive, and require only a single dose to be
effective. However, they should not be used in sick animals and may cause
suppression of the immune system in susceptible animals or abortions in pregnant
bitches.
Vaccinations challenge the immune system in
a complex manner, so it is not advisable to vaccinate a puppy or dog that is
sick. Vaccines can fail if the animal has a fever or is taking steroids, or if
they are given too close together or too far apart. They can also fail if the
vaccine has been improperly handled or stored and may not protect a puppy that
has lost immunity from mothers milk before the vaccine is administered.
Despite problems, vaccinations are still a
pet owners best line of defense against distemper and parvovirus that can
kill puppies and young dogs, against rabies that will kill dogs and people
of any age, and against other contagious diseases that can cause short term
and long term health problems.
Pet owners should work with their
veterinarian to design a vaccination schedule for each pet based on age, health
status, reproductive status, and environment. Rotating vaccines so that they are
not all given at once is one option, and titer tests for antibodies is another.
However, titer tests are more expensive than vaccinations and not completely
reliable, so many vets do not recommend them.
If owners do vaccinate a pet and he has a
reaction, it should be reported to the veterinarian and the US Pharmacopeia, a
private organization that operates a reporting program in conjunction with the
American Veterinary Medical Association. USP can be reached at www.usp.org on
the world wide web or at (800) 487-7776.
If pet owners and their veterinarians
decide that other than an annual vaccination is appropriate for particular pets,
owners should get a veterinary statement to that effect if questioned at a
grooming shop, boarding kennel, or training school. Those who plan to board pets
should get the intranasal Bordatella vaccine at least two weeks before vacation
dates, for this vaccine has a shorter period of effectiveness than parvo or
distemper vaccines.
Annual exams
Annual boosters for Fido and Fluffy
is really shorthand for yearly checkup. The veterinarian does far more
than inject the vaccine; he listens to heart and lungs, probes belly, looks at
teeth and gums, examines eyes and ears, checks for parasites and skin disorders,
asks questions, watches the dog move. He discusses ideal weight and exercise if
necessary, and listens to questions and concerns of the owner. Dogs that visit
the veterinarian once a year live longer and are less likely to be surrendered
to a shelter because the owner has an animal health professional to answer
questions and to find potential problems before they become serious. Shot
clinics in pet supply stores do not provide these opportunities.
Homeopathic remedies an
alternative to vaccines?
Herbal and homeopathic remedies and
treatments such as acupuncture and chiropractic are gaining popularity as
alternatives to modern medicine for people and pets, but it is highly unlikely
that anything in this assortment of alternative remedies will replace
vaccinations against canine and feline diseases. Homeopathic nosodes have been
used as a vaccine substitute and credited with preventing these diseases, but
there are no studies that support their use on a broad scale and no quality
assurance in their production.
Susan Gayle Wynn, DVM, said on the
Alternative Veterinary Medicine website (AltVetMed Vaccination Decisions) that
. . . unfortunately, there is no convincing evidence that nosodes do prevent
disease. A few studies published in homeopathic journals suggest that nosodes
may decrease the severity of active disease and possibly prevent the spread of
epidemics, but these studies are not well-controlled.
Wynn, a homeopathic veterinarian,
continued: The results of one well-controlled study suggest that parvovirus
nosodes are completely ineffective in preventing parvoviral disease under
experimental challenge conditions. Until well-designed studies are completed and
thousands of pet owners make a concerted effort to help with potential
retrospective studies, nosodes remain an unknown quantity and I do not recommend
using them as a sole strategy for disease prevention.
Dr. Wynn recommends puppy and kitten
vaccinations followed by annual boosters for a year or two.
Nosodes
Homeopathy was developed in the late 1700s
by German physician Samuel Hahnemann, who proposed that small doses of a
substance could prevent or cure diseases caused by large doses of the same
substance. This is the same principle behind the development of vaccines.
However, nosodes are produced according to Hahnemanns law of
infinitesimals, a technique that dilutes the original substance beyond
recognition, leaving no recognizable traces of the original substance and no
measurable protection in the animals body.